Why We Did This Audit
The U.S. government has significant economic, political, security, and humanitarian interests in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) that cover a range of topics from illicit drugs to immigration to foreign trade. Working with entities at a local level is an integral aspect of U.S. foreign assistance policy and an important mandate for USAID and the Inter-American Foundation (IAF).
USAID’s Administrator has identified localization as a top priority, and the agency intends to provide at least a quarter of its program funds to local entities by the end of fiscal year 2025. IAF directly invests in locally led development to advance program areas important to U.S. foreign assistance.
However, as with any foreign assistance award, there are risks, including those associated with engaging local entities. For example, USAID has encountered challenges when working with local entities that lack sufficient expertise or financial resources to implement U.S. programs or adhere to U.S. regulations. Furthermore, U.S. government efforts in the LAC region face a range of external issues, such as corruption and criminal activity.
We conducted this audit to determine the extent to which (1) selected USAID missions and (2) IAF implemented procedures for managing risks when selecting local entities for awards in LAC.
What We Found
The three USAID missions we reviewed implemented certain required agency procedures before making awards to LAC entities but missed opportunities to enhance risk management. The missions conducted pre-award risk assessments for all sampled awards, including considering past performance and organizational and financial capacity. However, two of the three missions did not request or document required reviews to determine whether local entities had any known involvement with drug trafficking. Two missions did not consistently obtain signed certifications and assurance statements attesting recipients’ compliance with all relevant U.S. laws and USAID policies. All three missions also missed opportunities to fully integrate USAID’s enterprise risk management (ERM) guidance into their pre-award risk assessment processes.
IAF implemented risk management procedures before awarding LAC grants but did not follow certain Federal requirements or use an ERM framework to inform its practices. IAF took steps to identify and assess risks during the pre-award process for the sampled awards. However, IAF did not ensure that the required reviews were conducted to determine whether key individuals from local entities had any known involvement with drug trafficking prior to making the awards. Furthermore, while IAF adopted some risk management procedures, the agency did not have a formal ERM framework in place to inform and guide implementation of those practices.
What We Recommend
We made six recommendations—three for USAID and three for IAF—to improve compliance with agency and Federal requirements and strengthen pre-award risk management procedures. USAID and IAF agreed with five of our recommendations. USAID partially agreed with one recommendation.