Recommendation Dashboard

OIG makes recommendations in our reports to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of agency programs and help agencies identify questioned costs and funds that could be put to better use. The aim is to spur our audited agencies to take corrective actions, which allow us to close the recommendations.

This dashboard identifies current open recommendations along with the associated questioned costs.  Open recommendations may be resolved or unresolved:

  • A recommendation is resolved when OIG agrees with the agency's plan of action.
  • A recommendation is unresolved when the agency has yet to share a plan of action or OIG disagrees with the plan.

The dashboard below may not reflect accurate numbers due to temporarily unavailable resources. We apologize for any inconvenience. Please check back soon.

 

Total Open Recommendations (As of 5/30/25)

343

Open Financial Recommendations (As of 5/30/25)

$56,304,556


Please see an updated list of recommendations with their corresponding report below.

2011

Jul 27, 2011
Audit Report
5-440-11-009-P
Recommendation
1

USAID/Vietnam work with the contractor to develop and approve a monitoring and evaluation plan, which would include output, outcome, and impact indicators directly attributable to the program's efforts. The plan should include baseline data, cumulative program targets, etc.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 16, 2012
Recommendation
2

USAID/Vietnam conduct a data quality assessment of the information being reported in the program's monitoring and evaluation plan once it is approved.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 16, 2012
Recommendation
3

USAID/Vietnam, through its contracting officer, either ratify the elimination of activities to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV, or disallow the change in the program's scope. If the change in scope is ratified, the contract should be modified; if disallowed, the contracting officer should determine the appropriate corrective action to be taken.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 16, 2012
Recommendation
4

USAID/Vietnam assess the program's current intervention for sex workers who inject drugs to determine whether there is a more efficient way to reach this group. If not, the mission should decide whether it wishes to continue the program's efforts, or incorporate Break the Cycle outreach for sex workers who inject drugs into the outreach of other PEPFAR implementers already targeting sex workers.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 16, 2012
Recommendation
5

USAID/Vietnam direct the contractor to provide guidance to outreach workers on reporting accurate information on condom failure rates, and incorporate accurate information on condom failure rates into future training.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 16, 2012
Recommendation
6

USAID/Vietnam direct the contractor to incorporate regular monitoring and reporting on the condition of condoms stocked in nontraditional outlets, to help ensure the quality of these condoms.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 16, 2012
Recommendation
7

USAID/Vietnam select a sample of the nontraditional outlets in An Giang Province to test for condom quality.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 16, 2012
Recommendation
8

USAID/Vietnam clearly communicate the need to implement the unique identifier code to those implementing the pilot program in Hai Phong Province.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jul 27, 2011
Recommendation
9

USAID/Vietnam clarify to all PEPFAR implementers its expectation of how and when PEPFAR-supported voluntary counseling and testing sites are to be branded with the Chan Troi Moi logo.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 16, 2012
Recommendation
10

USAID/Vietnam provide specific guidance to its PEPFAR-supported implementers on how it wants them to coordinate their efforts and which implementing organization shall take the lead in critical program areas

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 16, 2012
Jul 21, 2011
Audit Report
5-388-11-008-P
Recommendation
1

USAID/Bangladesh direct the International Resources Group to prepare a sustainability plan for the co-management organizations that will identify potential barriers to sustainability, and describe the project's plans to overcome such barriers.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jul 21, 2011
Recommendation
2

USAID/Bangladesh, in conjunction with the Government of Bangladesh, develop and implement an action plan to obtain required government-matched funds for the project's habitat restoration and infrastructure activities.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jul 12, 2012
Recommendation
3

USAID/Bangladesh require the International Resources Group to comply with the branding and marking policy and submit a written request to the mission for a waiver to use the Nishorgo Network name and logo on appropriate project documents and signage.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jul 21, 2011
Jul 21, 2011
Audit Report
9-000-11-002-P
Recommendation
1.1

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to include environmental requirements in awards for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations. The procedures should also require, when possible, that environmental requirements be included in solicitations. When inclusion in the solicitation is not feasible, the procedures should require the inclusion of environmental requirements in subsequent scopes of work.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2012
Recommendation
1.2

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to include environmental requirements in awards for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations. The procedures should also require, when possible, that environmental requirements be included in solicitations. When inclusion in the solicitation is not feasible, the procedures should require the inclusion of environmental requirements in subsequent scopes of work.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 29, 2012
Recommendation
1.3

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to include environmental requirements in awards for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations. The procedures should also require, when possible, that environmental requirements be included in solicitations. When inclusion in the solicitation is not feasible, the procedures should require the inclusion of environmental requirements in subsequent scopes of work.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 25, 2012
Recommendation
1.4

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to include environmental requirements in awards for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations. The procedures should also require, when possible, that environmental requirements be included in solicitations. When inclusion in the solicitation is not feasible, the procedures should require the inclusion of environmental requirements in subsequent scopes of work.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 27, 2012
Recommendation
1.5

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to include environmental requirements in awards for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations. The procedures should also require, when possible, that environmental requirements be included in solicitations. When inclusion in the solicitation is not feasible, the procedures should require the inclusion of environmental requirements in subsequent scopes of work.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 21, 2012
Recommendation
1.6

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to include environmental requirements in awards for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations. The procedures should also require, when possible, that environmental requirements be included in solicitations. When inclusion in the solicitation is not feasible, the procedures should require the inclusion of environmental requirements in subsequent scopes of work.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2012
Recommendation
2.1

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to properly monitor environmental compliance components for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2012
Recommendation
2.2

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to properly monitor environmental compliance components for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 29, 2012
Recommendation
2.3

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to properly monitor environmental compliance components for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 25, 2012
Recommendation
2.4

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to properly monitor environmental compliance components for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 27, 2012
Recommendation
2.5

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to properly monitor environmental compliance components for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 21, 2012
Recommendation
2.6

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to properly monitor environmental compliance components for projects with environmental threshold decisions of negative determination with conditions and positive determinations.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2012
Recommendation
3.1

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to formally designate officers for overseeing the planning and implementation of the Agency's environmental procedures.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2012
Recommendation
3.2

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to formally designate officers for overseeing the planning and implementation of the Agency's environmental procedures.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 29, 2012
Recommendation
3.3

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to formally designate officers for overseeing the planning and implementation of the Agency's environmental procedures.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 25, 2012
Recommendation
3.4

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to formally designate officers for overseeing the planning and implementation of the Agency's environmental procedures.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 27, 2012
Recommendation
3.5

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to formally designate officers for overseeing the planning and implementation of the Agency's environmental procedures.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 21, 2012
Recommendation
3.6

The Deputy Assistant Administrator of each regional bureau require missions to develop and implement procedures to formally designate officers for overseeing the planning and implementation of the Agency's environmental procedures.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2012
Jul 20, 2011
Audit Report
4-674-11-009-P
Recommendation
1

USAID/Southern Africa implement a standard annual work plan template for President's Emergency Plan for HIV/AIDS Relief treatment partners to effectively report and evaluate program performance.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jul 26, 2012
Recommendation
2

USAID/Southern Africa conduct an assessment of the effectiveness of the data warehouse.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jul 26, 2012
Recommendation
3

USAID/Southern Africa draft and approve a mutually agreeable comanagement plan for the data warehouse with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jul 26, 2012
Recommendation
4

USAID/Southern Africa identify the data used for reporting externally on Agency performance, and conduct data quality assessments on that data.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jul 26, 2012
Recommendation
5

USAID/Southern Africa implement a plan to divide roles and responsibilities more evenly among the HIV/AIDS treatment team members.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jul 26, 2012
Recommendation
6

USAID/Southern Africa add to its site visit checklist an item to monitor cost-sharing requirements.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jul 26, 2012
Jul 01, 2011
Audit Report
4-696-11-008-P
Recommendation
1

USAID/Rwanda develop and implement a cost-effective written plan to measure the impact of its agriculture activities.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jan 31, 2012
Recommendation
2

USAID/Rwanda prepare a written strategy for adapting and extending successful interventions targeted to people living with HIV/AIDS under the Dairy Competitiveness Project to the general rural population in future programming.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jan 31, 2012
Recommendation
3

USAID/Rwanda prepare a written analysis of successful strategies employed in its specialty coffee activities that can be adapted for use in future dairy programming.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Oct 27, 2011
Recommendation
4

USAID/Rwanda include a section in its standard site visit report template to verify compliance with USAID branding policies and regulations.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Oct 27, 2011
Jun 30, 2011
Audit Report
6-294-11-008-P
Recommendation
1

USAID/West Bank and Gaza provide detailed definitions of all Infrastructure Needs Program indicators in writing to all partners.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Aug 03, 2012
Recommendation
2

USAID/West Bank and Gaza develop and implement a plan with milestones to establish controls that require indicator data reported under the Infrastructure Needs Program I and Infrastructure Needs Program II are accurate and reliable.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Aug 03, 2012
Recommendation
3

USAID/West Bank and Gaza verify and correct in writing any errors in the reported results data for the Infrastructure Needs Program.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Aug 03, 2012
Recommendation
4

USAID/West Bank and Gaza strengthen results reporting by requiring that program indicators are effective in measuring goal achievements for the Infrastructure Needs Program I and the Infrastructure Needs Program II.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Aug 03, 2012
Recommendation
5

USAID/West Bank and Gaza prepare and approve Performance Management Plans for all mission activity objectives in accordance with Automated
Directives System 203.3.3.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Aug 03, 2012
Jun 22, 2011
Audit Report
2-000-11-005-S
Recommendation
1

USAID's Chief Financial Officer implement improvements in the design of the PhoenixViewer Current Status by Program Element report to provide more reliable and consistent financial information.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 23, 2012
Recommendation
2

USAID's Chief Financial Officer identify financial transactions and resolve any additional inconsistencies that are presenting negative unliquidated obligations in the PhoenixViewer Current Status by Program Element report.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 26, 2012
Jun 20, 2011
Audit Report
G-391-11-005-P
Recommendation
1

USAID/Pakistan designate one person in each technical office who has received training to oversee environmental compliance for projects and activities.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jun 20, 2011
Recommendation
2

USAID/Pakistan identify projects planned for the next 3 years to determine whether USAID/Pakistan has sufficient support and technical expertise for environmental compliance.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jun 20, 2011
Recommendation
3

USAID/Pakistan revise the scope of work and reduce the contract amount for financial and management support for the Quick Impact Projects in South Waziristan.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jun 20, 2011
Recommendation
4

USAID/Pakistan verify that that the USAID contractor, Associates in Development, has a code of business ethics and conduct that meets USAID standards and regulations.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jun 20, 2011
Recommendation
5

USAID/Pakistan provide implementers with copies of USAID's policies on ethics and conflicts of interest, and with written explanations and examples of potential conflicts.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
May 31, 2012
Recommendation
6

USAID/Pakistan, in cooperation with USAID's Compliance and Oversight Division for Partner Performance, designate personnel to provide guidance on conflicts of interest and to monitor implementers' compliance with ethics policies and procedures.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jun 20, 2011
Recommendation
7

USAID/Pakistan develop and implement a plan for periodic internal review of contract files for a complete history of contract transactions and all communications with contractors. Results of the review should be noted for corrective action.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jun 20, 2011
Recommendation
8

USAID/Pakistan develop and implement a plan to monitor and document the status of branding and marking plans of contractors working on the Quick Impact Projects in South Waziristan, and provide training as necessary for compliance with Automated Directives System 320.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
May 31, 2012
Recommendation
9

USAID/Pakistan provide additional details to the Federally Administrated Tribal Areas Secretariat concerning publicizing and marking USAID's contribution to the Quick Impact Projects in South Waziristan as specified in the implementation letter dated December 31, 2009.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
May 31, 2012
Jun 19, 2011
Audit Report
F-306-11-003-P
Recommendation
1

USAID/Afghanistan undertake a technical evaluation of the effectiveness of voter education and civic education efforts it has supported.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 09, 2012
Recommendation
2

USAID/Afghanistan prepare a more formal project design document for the follow-on program after the Support to the Electoral Process Program ends in June 2011 that explicitly identifies the critical assumptions underlying the program design.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 09, 2012
Recommendation
3

USAID/Afghanistan develop detailed plans for addressing the legal reforms, financial and constitutional arrangements for elections, and voter registration issues discussed in this finding in conjunction with the Government of Afghanistan, other local stakeholders, and international donors.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 09, 2012
Recommendation
4

USAID/Afghanistan complete all required contractor performance reviews under the Support to the Electoral Process contract in accordance with Federal Acquisitions Regulation and Agency for International Development Acquisitions Regulation requirements.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 09, 2012
Recommendation
5

USAID/Afghanistan prepare an implementation plan for use of the $1.4 million rural radio supplemental funding consistent with the goals of the program, or reprogram these funds for other mission programs.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
May 21, 2012
Recommendation
6

USAID/Afghanistan determine the allowability of the $6,350,319 incurred by the International Republican Institute for security expenses, and recover any costs determined to be unreasonable.

Questioned Cost
6350319
Close Date
Dec 29, 2011
Recommendation
7

USAID/Afghanistan establish procedures and criteria for determining the reasonableness of security costs charged by implementing partners.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 24, 2012
Recommendation
8

USAID/Afghanistan's follow-on program require members of the Consortium for Election and Political Process Strengthening to consolidate functions and facilities to the extent possible to reduce expenses.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 09, 2012
Recommendation
9

USAID/Afghanistan require the International Republican Institute, as the lead partner in the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening, to submit a Consortium marking and branding plan and verify that the plan has been implemented.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 09, 2012
Jun 15, 2011
Audit Report
7-688-11-009-P
Recommendation
1

USAID/Mali (1) review its indicators closely to
ensure that the indicator definition and wording are consistent, (2) establish and update targets for each indicator, and (3) report its results accurately based on the correct reporting period in the mission's performance plan and report, the President's Malaria Initiative annual report, and the performance management plan.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 21, 2012
Recommendation
2

USAID/Mali's health team include other performance indicators in the performance management plan that measure the achievements of its malaria portfolio (in addition to those required by the President's Malaria Initiative).

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 21, 2012
Recommendation
3

USAID/Mali require CARE to report results on malaria-related indicators and targets included in the 2011 work plan.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2011
Recommendation
4

USAID/Mali develop and implement a plan with Research Triangle Institute to record data accurately and minimize the possibility of human errors such as double counting.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2011
Recommendation
5

USAID/Mali, in conjunction with Research Triangle Institute, establish and implement a plan to ensure that all spray operators are using a consistent definition of a structure when tallying results.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2011
Recommendation
6

USAID/Mali, in conjunction with CARE, verify the malaria-related results in CARE's FY 2010 annual report.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2011
Recommendation
7

USAID/Mali work closely with John Snow Inc. to (1) ensure that it has accurately recorded, reported, and filed all orders that have been
placed and (2) develop a plan to ensure that future discrepancies are avoided.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jun 15, 2011
Recommendation
8

USAID/Mali complete required data quality assessments for all indicators reported in its annual performance plan and report.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2011
Recommendation
9

USAID/Mali develop a procedure to document all site visits and require that visits include data quality testing and verification when possible.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jun 15, 2011
Recommendation
10

USAID/Mali develop and implement a plan to reinforce the skills of the staff at health-care facilities to enable them to maintain accurate inventory records and manage stock properly.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Jun 15, 2011
Recommendation
11

USAID/Mali develop and implement standard procedures for net distribution and receipt, and verify that the procedures are applied uniformly at all health facilities.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Mar 21, 2012
Recommendation
12

USAID/Mali develop and implement a plan with Research Triangle Institute to ensure that beneficiaries are aware that indoor residual spraying is provided by the American people.

Questioned Cost
0
Close Date
Sep 28, 2011